ш.Душанбе, кч. У. Хайём 120,
Ҷумҳурии Тоҷикистон, 734017
(+992 37)224 03 74

E -mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

This information gap is huge. Current estimates on disability indicate that EU governments lack comparable data on the life experiences of as many as 80 million people.

As the recent PRISM program scandal in the United States highlighted, corporations and governments can gather information of any kind about us. Your emails, the foods you like, where you travel, and your shopping preferences are all examples of personal data that can be mined for profiling purposes.

It’s ironic, then, that when discussing ethnic minorities or people with disabilities in Europe, “no data available” is a common excuse for not doing more to fight discrimination and inequality.

The Open Society Foundations have grappled with this excuse far too frequently in our grantmaking, advocacy, and litigation work. In 2013, we launched the Equality Data Initiative, which aims to compel European states to collect information such as employment situation, educational achievement, and housing distribution for groups at risk of discrimination. The pilot phase focuses on education in Bulgaria, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Romania, and Sweden, and on public employment in France.

The collection of precise data on inequality is an essential element in identifying gaps in public policies, and implementing remedial steps. Lack of data masks inequalities and hinders the exposure and monitoring of these gaps by civil society. Government assertions about how well they are doing in closing the gaps cannot be verified.

Such benefits of collecting data on groups at risk of discrimination are well known to human rights bodies. The Council of Europe’s Commission on Racism and Intolerance, the Commissioner for Human Rights, and the UN Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism have all addressed multiple recommendations on the matter to European governments. In a 2007 report, the Commission on Racism and Intolerance described the “production of detailed statistics” as a “prime necessity for compliance with European laws.” And a report released this month by the Open Society Foundations cites a lack of equality data as a primary barrier to the implementation of the EU’s Race Equality Directive.

Under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the EU and its member states have a responsibility to “collect appropriate information, including statistical and research data, to enable them to formulate and implement policies.” Though the European Commission, Fundamental Rights Agency, and Eurostat have attempted to take on this message, most EU member states have not.

This information gap is huge. Current estimates on disability indicate that EU governments lack comparable data on the life experiences of as many as 80 million people. Further, according to multiple Euro barometer surveys, racial or ethnic discrimination has been widely perceived as the most widespread type of discrimination in the EU over the last 10 years. Despite this, no estimates are available on how many people experience inequality because of their racial or ethnic origin. Among EU member states, only the U.K. collects equality data on the life experiences of its racial minority population.

Why are most European governments reluctant to collect such valuable data? Two of the most common reasons given are privacy and the risk of further stereotyping minorities by categorizing them.

The privacy argument has been addressed by EU authorities. Since 1995, the EU’s data protection law has provided detailed guidelines for the collection of “special categories of data” such as racial or ethnic origin and health condition. The Council of Europe’s Strasbourg Court and Commission on Racism and Intolerance have affirmed that as long as governments comply with safeguards such as getting the consent of the respondents, enabling them to self-identify, and anonymizing the data, data collection is possible.

For its part, the Open Society Foundations’ Equality Data Initiative supports only data collection processes where individuals explicitly consent to provide sensitive information about themselves for their benefit and that of the larger community, where everyone has the right to choose how to define themselves in terms of racial or ethnic background or in light of a disability, and in which everyone’s own privacy is granted through the anonymized processing of the data.

The second argument, that data collection entrenches discrimination, has recently become a topic of intense debate throughout Europe. The argument against data collection has two major elements:

· In continental Europe, discussion of race or ethnicity remains taboo because of lingering memories from World War II, when categorization of minorities led to human rights abuses.

· Individuals sometimes fear stressing characteristics that may lead to stereotyping. Practices such as ethnic profiling by police or the segregation of children with disabilities substantiate these fears.

These fears are mitigated by the emergence of an increasing number of representative groups advocating for the collection of equality data, such as the Representative Council of Black Associations and theCollective against Islamophobia in France and the Disability Federation of Ireland.

When used correctly, equality data can do enormous good. For example, in England, the mission of theEquality Diversity Body of the Open University is to monitor, analyze and accommodate the needs of students and staff belonging to vulnerable groups. In order to perform its duties, the body asks students to fill in an anonymous form where everyone can decide to self-identify in terms of their special educational needs, physical disability, racial background, religion, and even sexual orientation. The argument used by the body is a simple one: “If you don’t fill in the form and then find that no one’s thought about YOUR needs well, you can hardly complain, can you?” Data collected through the form is used by the Open University to design measures to accommodate groups at risks of discrimination or underachievement.

It is high time that European governments pay more attention to the situation and the needs of their racial, ethnic, or religious minorities and disabled constituencies, starting with making them visible. Do you believe that European governments should collect data on groups at risk of discrimination? Share your views in the comment section below.

Learn More:

Europe, Rights & Justice, Discrimination, EU Policy



Дар партави Паёмҳои Президенти Ҷумҳурии Тоҷикистон, ғамхориҳои Ҳукумати Ҷумҳурии Тоҷикистон нисбати маъюбон ва дастгирии Вазорати меҳнат ва ҳифзи истимоии аҳолӣ, Вазорати рушди иқтисод ва савдо ва Вазорати маорифи Ҷумҳурии Тоҷикистон 23 нафар хатмкардагони Муассисаи давлатии «Литсей-интернати касбии махсуси маъюбони Вазорати меҳнат ва ҳифзи иҷтимоии аҳолии Ҷумҳурии Тоҷикистон» ба муассисаҳои олии касбӣ ва миёнаи касбии ҷумҳурӣ, аз ҷумла ба Донишкадаи санъати Тоҷикистон - 1 нафар, Донишгохи миллии Тоҷикистон – 5 нафар, Донишгоҳи технологии Тоҷикистон – 3 нафар, Донишкадаи молия ва иқтисод – 1 нафар, Донишгоҳи техникии Тоҷикистон - 3 нафар, Донишгоҳи давлатии омўзгории Тоҷикистон – 2 нафар, Донишгоҳи аграрии Тоҷикистон – 1 нафар, Донишгоҳи давлатии шаҳри Хоруғ- 2 нафар, Донишгоҳи давлатии шаҳри Қурғонтеппа – 1 нафар ва коллеҷҳои тиббии шаҳрҳои Душанбе – 1нафар, Қурғонтеппа – 1 нафар, ноҳияи Панҷ – 1 нафар дохил шуданд.

Агентии давлатии ҳифзи иҷтимоӣ, шуғли аҳолӣ ва муҳоҷират

С 24 по 29 сентября 2013 года в рамках проекта «Общественное здоровье» в целевых районах Раштской долины (Рашт, Тавильдара, Таджикабад, Джиргиталь) проведены однодневные тренинги.

Тренинги были организованы для районных сотрудников и волонтеров с целью обучения проведения оценки согласно разработанному формату. Проведение оценки осонована по модулю 3 CBHFA – «Деятельность, основанная на оценке потребностей в моем сообществе». Использованы методы обучения взрослой аудитории, интерактивный метод общения.

Всего на тренингах обучены 101 волонтеры, которые путем опроса при подворных обходах проведут опрос 405 членов домохозяйств.

На тренинге волонтеры освоили, что является целью опроса, что результаты опроса должны быть реальными, и по меньше мере 1 мужчина и 1 женщина добровольцы берут интервью в каждой деревне.

Волонтеры так же были обучены нижеследующим базовым перечням/требованиям проведения оценки:

· Выбор целевых домохозяйств где будет проводиться опрос, должнен быть, определен случайным методом.

· По возможности волонтеры мужчины должны опрашивать членов семей мужчин, а женщины волонтеры должны опрашивать женщин. Хотя необходимо отметить, что волонтеры женщины и мужчины, выразили мнение, что они имеют возможность опрашивать мужчин или женщин, если они являются односельчанинами, объясняя тем, что имеют очень хорошие соседские отношения.

· Каждую семью при опросе должны информировать, что будет сохранена конфиденциальность, что имена не будут отражены в формате опроса.

· Выбор респондента с которым будет проведено интервью, должен выбраться по методу лотереи.

Групповые работы среди участников

Менеджер в виде показательного опроса продемонстрировала один опрос с респондентом (волонтером) и наглядно все остальные волонтеры проследили по ходу опроса заданные по формату вопросы и ответы.

В последующем все участники были разделены на пары (волонтер и респондент), и в виде игры они прошли опрос по стандартному формату. ( смотри Фото ниже).

Мирова Д.С.Менеджер проекта «Здоровое Сообщество»

18 сентябри соли 2013 Муовини якуми Раиси Мачлиси намояндагони Мачлиси Олии Чумхурии Точикистон Амиршо Миралиев намояндагони Кумитаи байналмилалии Салиби Сурх (КБСС)-ро ба хузур пазируфт. Сўхбат дар атрофи масоили хамкорихои ба хар ду чониб судманд чараён гирифт. Нахуст Амиршо Миралиев ба мехмонон мухтасар оид ба раванди истиќлолияти давлатии Чумхурии Точикистон, корхои ободони ва созандагии Давлат ва Хукумати кишвар, сиёсати дохили ва хоричии мамлакат маълумот дода, накши чомеаи чахони дар барќарорсозии сулху субот, кумакхои ташкилотхои башардустона аз чумла Кумитаи байналмилалии Салиби Сурхро ба мардуми чумхури мухсус таъкид кард. Вай хамчунин тавачухи мехмононро ба масъалањое, ки вобаста ба онхо бо КБСС дар оянда хамкорихоро вусъат бахшидан мумкин аст, чалб кард.

Дар ин робита Муовини якуми Раиси Мачлиси намояндагони Мачлиси Олии Чумхурии Точикистон Амиршо Миралиев иброз дошт, ки мо омодаем барои фаъолияти минбаъдаи пурсамар ва манфиатбахши КБСС дар Чумхурии Точикистон мусоидат намоем.

Сардори Сарраёсати КБСС оид ба њамкори бо кишвархои Аврупо ва Осиёи маркази Лоран Корба аз пешниходи маълумоти муфассал ва пазироии самимона изхори миннатдори карда, ин мулоќотро судманд арзёби кард. Вай низ дар бораи фаъолияти КБСС дар кишварњои чахон ахбороти мухтасар пешниход карда, рочеъ ба самтхои хамкори бо Чумхурии Точикистон харф зад.

Зимни мулокот як нуктаи чолиб махсус таъкид гардид, ки Чумхурии Точикистон дар миёни кишвархои ИДМ давлатест, ки оид ба фаъолияти Чамъияти Хилоли Ахмар конуни махсуси худро дорад.

Дар мулокот рохбари Намояндагии минтаќавии КБСС барои кишвархои Осиёи Маркази Жак Вийетта, сардори намояндаги дар Чумхурии Точикистон Северин Шаппаз, корманди КБСС Валерий Ярмак ва Котиби Генералии Чамъияти Хилоли Ахмари Точикистон Зафар Мухаббатов иштирок доштанд.


Back to top